Great view Daniel. Any way to speed up payout and decision making is welcome. The process for exhausting all possible legal angles is in itself, exhausting!. … it makes little sense in seeing courts get overturned in spiral and again in the Supreme Court. Personally I think the whole system takes too long. Clear and obvious redress should not take too long. Indeed I think the input of the highest court should be involved from the beginning. Funnily enough, Sharia Law, something I know little about, have a private meeting with two parties that get together by appointment where an immediate decision is made. I really don’t see why this type of system can be applied to minor cases. It’s the same type of problem I see with planning permission. Instead of waiting and seeing what can’t be done, why not get instruction from the beginning what can be done. Taking away protracted procedures. I get it for involved or important cases but general damages and blame can be established fast. Making a claim easier and faster. It also makes the plaintiffs aware they should make a better job of reaching a deal. By making procedures protracted it stalls everything. We need fast and fair judgments without the wait. Surely that’s not beyond us. Put the spirit of the law paramount. Not the actual words of the law. Most cases are not preceded because liability is unsure. Get that done first. In all cases. Get them on track right from the start. That’s my view.
Great view Daniel. Any way to speed up payout and decision making is welcome. The process for exhausting all possible legal angles is in itself, exhausting!. … it makes little sense in seeing courts get overturned in spiral and again in the Supreme Court. Personally I think the whole system takes too long. Clear and obvious redress should not take too long. Indeed I think the input of the highest court should be involved from the beginning. Funnily enough, Sharia Law, something I know little about, have a private meeting with two parties that get together by appointment where an immediate decision is made. I really don’t see why this type of system can be applied to minor cases. It’s the same type of problem I see with planning permission. Instead of waiting and seeing what can’t be done, why not get instruction from the beginning what can be done. Taking away protracted procedures. I get it for involved or important cases but general damages and blame can be established fast. Making a claim easier and faster. It also makes the plaintiffs aware they should make a better job of reaching a deal. By making procedures protracted it stalls everything. We need fast and fair judgments without the wait. Surely that’s not beyond us. Put the spirit of the law paramount. Not the actual words of the law. Most cases are not preceded because liability is unsure. Get that done first. In all cases. Get them on track right from the start. That’s my view.