Erm, I'll keep this brief, unlike some others. Glad you coped with the Eloquent One. And inter alia thank you for pointing out how ahistorical is the history-obsessed religion of Marxism.
Interesting article. To me socialism is trying to be fair to all so as to carry the people with a ‘stick’ because as we know dissenters are ‘hit’ with it! But in contrast, capitalism is the ‘carrot’ using wealth, or rather money itself as the driving force. But, in reality just like solving a good mathematical equation there is only one way it can work! Either carrot or stick are now well used and now in my view out of date! The monetary system of either is pretty much the same! The few rich holding most of the money get richer while the poor stay poor or get poorer with use and a wasted life! In my view we have better tools now to aid society that we have never had in abundance previously, namely computers and democracy’s! We don’t use either enough! For example, computers can now track ALL money! But we don’t use that system to its optimum. Probably because we have one foot still in both camps of socialism and capitalism trying to reconcile both or either. More reasonably now we are fighting more than ever to retain our precious democracy’s. Because the actual answer lay in both. Fairness and wealth creation for the good of all ( the best bits of both!). In our democracy’s the 49% have to adhere to the 51%. Recently seen in our Brexit vote. (Notwithstanding that in fact it was less than satisfactory that we left at all on a real vote of less than 49% when taken against the total possible voters that could have rejected it if only they voted!) in my view it was an insufficient vote to carry us out. That said we’re out! But it’s a clear democratic vote. We don’t use them enough. But I digress, going back to socialism and capitalism both, clearly don’t work when it comes to a democratic balance on money! Both allow few to hold the majority of money and that my friend is not just undemocratic but mathematically ‘wrong’. It’s an archaic and therefore out of date method and is clearly unfair. With computers we can track every penny. And now we are out of EU control we can at last reinstate our exchange control regulations! Removed by Thatcher in 1979 at great cost to us now, namely 2.8 trillion pounds of borrowing our own money back! Madness!! We now have the means to keep all pounds in the UK. And control that by computers. Spending us the key because without money flow nothing works. Wealth should be the stuff of life we work for and buy and not the money itself! Why? Because without it flowing we get stagnation! Make spending the ‘have to’ position and work the driving force to spend as much as we can earn thus optimising the system and in so perpetuates that flow to allow earning and spending to create a monetary system that works, all the time, autonomously and perpetually! Income tax is daylight robbery! Taken BEFORE we get a chance to spend it! The clever rich avoid it and sit on money for so long it makes the majority of people devoid of it! Tax is not widely understood! It’s triggered by SPENDING! So don’t you think it should be spending that cures the stagnant economy? Of course it should! But unlike a bill had to be paid by a certain time we allow the return of money NOT to be time specific and that’s the problem! We allow wealthy minority to hold most of the money for too long! Thats the problem! If money revolves faster snd in totality tax revenue would create a tsunami of tax revenue due to the spending that would then take place! Is simple really but only now available by way of computer accounts and digital currency electronically. Earn as much as you can, but you have to spend it! Or if unspent it is taken by the exchequer! That rule would make all spend! It’s so countertustive to now but, it would create wealth and happiness never seen before.
very good and well argued
thank you, now where is that sticky bun!
Erm, I'll keep this brief, unlike some others. Glad you coped with the Eloquent One. And inter alia thank you for pointing out how ahistorical is the history-obsessed religion of Marxism.
Interesting article. To me socialism is trying to be fair to all so as to carry the people with a ‘stick’ because as we know dissenters are ‘hit’ with it! But in contrast, capitalism is the ‘carrot’ using wealth, or rather money itself as the driving force. But, in reality just like solving a good mathematical equation there is only one way it can work! Either carrot or stick are now well used and now in my view out of date! The monetary system of either is pretty much the same! The few rich holding most of the money get richer while the poor stay poor or get poorer with use and a wasted life! In my view we have better tools now to aid society that we have never had in abundance previously, namely computers and democracy’s! We don’t use either enough! For example, computers can now track ALL money! But we don’t use that system to its optimum. Probably because we have one foot still in both camps of socialism and capitalism trying to reconcile both or either. More reasonably now we are fighting more than ever to retain our precious democracy’s. Because the actual answer lay in both. Fairness and wealth creation for the good of all ( the best bits of both!). In our democracy’s the 49% have to adhere to the 51%. Recently seen in our Brexit vote. (Notwithstanding that in fact it was less than satisfactory that we left at all on a real vote of less than 49% when taken against the total possible voters that could have rejected it if only they voted!) in my view it was an insufficient vote to carry us out. That said we’re out! But it’s a clear democratic vote. We don’t use them enough. But I digress, going back to socialism and capitalism both, clearly don’t work when it comes to a democratic balance on money! Both allow few to hold the majority of money and that my friend is not just undemocratic but mathematically ‘wrong’. It’s an archaic and therefore out of date method and is clearly unfair. With computers we can track every penny. And now we are out of EU control we can at last reinstate our exchange control regulations! Removed by Thatcher in 1979 at great cost to us now, namely 2.8 trillion pounds of borrowing our own money back! Madness!! We now have the means to keep all pounds in the UK. And control that by computers. Spending us the key because without money flow nothing works. Wealth should be the stuff of life we work for and buy and not the money itself! Why? Because without it flowing we get stagnation! Make spending the ‘have to’ position and work the driving force to spend as much as we can earn thus optimising the system and in so perpetuates that flow to allow earning and spending to create a monetary system that works, all the time, autonomously and perpetually! Income tax is daylight robbery! Taken BEFORE we get a chance to spend it! The clever rich avoid it and sit on money for so long it makes the majority of people devoid of it! Tax is not widely understood! It’s triggered by SPENDING! So don’t you think it should be spending that cures the stagnant economy? Of course it should! But unlike a bill had to be paid by a certain time we allow the return of money NOT to be time specific and that’s the problem! We allow wealthy minority to hold most of the money for too long! Thats the problem! If money revolves faster snd in totality tax revenue would create a tsunami of tax revenue due to the spending that would then take place! Is simple really but only now available by way of computer accounts and digital currency electronically. Earn as much as you can, but you have to spend it! Or if unspent it is taken by the exchequer! That rule would make all spend! It’s so countertustive to now but, it would create wealth and happiness never seen before.